ARLA/CLUSTER: Comissão Europeia responde evasivamente sobre o PLT/PLC

[José Miguel Fonte]

Pena que as perguntas apesar de pertinentes têm um fundamento que acaba 
por ter pontos algo absurdos.

No entanto a resposta é um hino à absurdidade e estupidez.

Então o problema não são os dispositivos mas sim os fios...

"The radius of disturbance of PLT equipment, if any, is difficult to 
estimate as the disturbance does not come from the PLT device itself but 
from the wires (domestic or office electrical installations) to which it 
is connected."

A peça denominada de Tajani sem se aperceber acabou por confirmar a 
inviabilidade  desta tecnologia.

Como alguém disse, andamos a ser geridos por répteis. Isto para não 
dizer outra(s) coisa(s)...

Alguém que lhe diga, que se não forem "esses fios" deixa de se chamar PLT.

Enfim...

73 de ct1enq

Em 17-04-2011 23:05, João Costa > CT1FBF escreveu:
> Parliamentary question on PLT answered by European Commission
>
> IARU Region 1 reports that an EU Parliamentary question on PLT has
> received an evasive answer from the European Commission.
>
> The EUROCOM Working Group introduced a parliamentary question to MEP
> Birgit Sippel, the sponsor of the exhibition on amateur radio in the
> European Parliament about a year ago. She forward it to the commission
> to be answered in written form. Just recently the answer was
> published, being rather evasive. EUROCOM plans to stick to the topic,
> trying to get a more precise answer.
>
> PLT Question
> http://www.dl9kce.de/hide/110415%20EC%20PLC%20Sippel%20Question%20EN.pdf
>
> EU Commission Answer
> http://www.dl9kce.de/hide/110415%20EC%20PLC%20Sippel%20Answer%20EN.pdfuster