ARLA/CLUSTER: RE: Death of short wave imminent

[Carlos Mourato]

Exactamente

Se o ruido fosse entre S9 e S9+40, então o limite seria a média ods dois ou
sejam, S9+20!...Só mesmo de uma besta com a concordância de outra besta como
o Bush, que alem de besta seria tambem um ignorante na matéria.
Imaginem isso aplicado às regras da estrada...Se apanhassem um carro a
300km/h e outro a 200, então o limite de velocidade seria de 250
Km/h...Estes legisladores, deviam ficar em casa a maioria do tempo!!!...Não
faziam nada, mas tambem não estragavam nada!!

73 de CT4RK


2011/4/5 João Gonçalves Costa <joao.a.costa  ctt.pt>

> Pois efectivamente é uma mentira do dia 1 de Abril, mas o mais interessante
> é que já vi  argumentação muito próxima, o fim da protecção contra
> interferências em HF, defendida pela FCC e empresas eléctricas que querem
> incentivar o negocio dos PLT/PLC tendo por base "short wave broadcasting is
> in rapid decline, with most broadcasters moving to the internet" .
>
> Alias, a melhor que conheço foi uma proposta da FCC no tempo da
> administração Bush que defendia que o valor de referencia do ruído zero
> deveria ser a media dos valores relativos encontrados, nos locais. Assim,
> alterava-se o nível do padrão de ruído para poder acomodar o PLC. Imagina-se
> isto, no seu equipamento de HF tinha ruído de S9+20dB, no entanto, isto
> seria o nível zero do padrão para a sua área, ou seja, o problema não estava
> em quem interferia mas sim no "excesso" de sensibilidade do seu equipamento.
> Por causa desta "brincadeira" vários inspectores da FCC que nunca poderiam
> concordar com isto, foram demitidos dos cargos, ou obrigados a pedir a
> reforma antecipada.
>
> Alias, o relatório do Congresso do E.U.A.: "Decepção e desconfiança: A
> Comissão Federal das Comunicações sob o mandato do presidente Kevin J.
> Martin" é uma investigação clarificadora que alertou de que maneira o Sr.
> Kevin  abusou de procedimentos dentro da FCC; manipulando ou suprimindo
> relatórios, dados e informações, em especial as apresentadas pela ARRL,
> sobre os efeitos nefastos da tecnologia BPL/PCL no espectro radioeléctrico,
> entre outras múltiplas acusações.
>
> O relatório pode ser lido aqui: http://tinyurl.com/3lmmo24
>
> João Costa, CT1FBF
>
> ________________________________
>
> De: cluster-bounces  radio-amador.net [mailto:
> cluster-bounces  radio-amador.net] Em nome de matos.jcf  mail.exercito.pt
> Enviada: terça-feira, 5 de Abril de 2011 16:14
> Para: cluster  radio-amador.net
> Assunto: ARLA/CLUSTER: Death of short wave imminent
>
>
>
> From: http://blog.g4ilo.com/
>
>
>
> Atenção que foi publicada no dia 01Abril mas, nunca fiando……………………………
>
>
>
>
> Death of short wave imminent <
> http://blog.g4ilo.com/2011/04/death-of-short-wave-imminent.html>
>
>
> Amateur radio as we know it could be extinct by the year 2020. That is the
> only possible conclusion to draw from an unpublished EU policy document that
> has been leaked to several ham radio bloggers including myself. The document
> proposes that existing RFI standards protecting the short wave frequencies
> be torn up as "preventing the use or increasing the cost of essential
> technology in order to protect the activities of a small number of hobbyists
> makes no political sense." This policy has already been unofficially in
> place at the UK's Ofcom <http://www.ban-plt.co.uk/truth-lies.php> , which
> was one of the major contributors to the report.
>
> The report suggests that withdrawing the standards relating to short wave
> RFI would save significant costs by removing the need to deal with
> complaints about interference. It also suggests that the UK
> Telecommunications Act (and similar laws in other EU countries) be amended
> to remove any right to protection from interference of the broadcast,
> amateur or CB services.
>
> To support its recommendations the report claims that "short wave
> broadcasting is in rapid decline, with most broadcasters moving to the
> internet" and that "the intended use of Citizens Band as a personal
> communications service has largely been replaced by cellphone usage."
> Amateur radio, it says, carries "little communication of any importance that
> could not be made using the telephone, cellular network or the internet."
> The main use of ham radio, it suggests, is "largely recreational" and could
> be replaced by "online simulations and VOIP chat services." Hams could also
> make more use of the largely interference-free bands above 400MHz which
> otherwise could be sold to commercial users. Radio amateurs "could still
> experiment with radio in the time-honoured manner, they just should not
> expect to be able to enjoy interference-free reception on the short waves."
>
> The reason for the desire to remove the protection of our frequencies
> becomes clear when you read the part of the report that describes
> forthcoming technologies that are expected to cause problems with RFI
> compliance. In order to meet carbon emissions targets and deal with expected
> power shortages caused by the early closure of nuclear power plants in
> countries such as Germany, the EU plans to introduce smart grids <
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smart_grid>  in all European nations by 2020.
> These smart grids use BPL technology to communicate with smart meters <
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smart_meter>  in each individual home. The
> smart meters, in turn, use PLT technology to communicate with smart devices
> in order to regulate their use. When demand for electricity is high, power
> cuts or the switching on of expensive standby power stations can be avoided
> by shutting off inessential devices instead. Examples of inessential devices
> given in the report include amateur radio linear amplifiers - assuming it's
> still possible to hear anything on short wave over the BPL and PLT QRM in
> the first place.
>
> The EU is also proposing that 80% of properties in member states should be
> equipped with solar panels by 2020. To achieve this target, installation
> costs will be heavily subsidized by governments, which clearly want to cut
> costs as far as possible. Estimates produced by a Chinese manufacturer of
> solar power systems suggest the cost saving that would result from
> eliminating the need for RFI suppression circuits in the power converters
> would amount to 4 billion Euro for the whole of Europe.
>
> The report concludes that "the cost of protecting the short wave spectrum
> from interference from technologies that are essential to be installed
> throughout Europe in the next decade to meet emissions targets and maintain
> the well-being of all European citizens is quite simply prohibitive" and
> urges that EU Commissioners pass the necessary laws by
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CLUSTER mailing list
> CLUSTER  radio-amador.net
> http://radio-amador.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cluster
>
>


-- 
*Best 73 from: regards from: CT4RK Carlos Mourato - Sines - Portugal*

 *Warning*
*Save the Radio Spectrum! Eliminate Broadband over Power Line. *
*
*
*Salve o espectro electromagnético!. Não use a rede electrica para
transmitir dados. Os "homeplugs power line" e a tecnologia "power line"
causa fortes interferencias noutro serviços sem voce se aperceber. Diga não
à tecnologia power line. Proteja o ambiente electromagnético. Utilize
tecnologia de redes sem fio, denominadas wireless.*
-----------------------------------------------------------
-------------- próxima parte ----------
Um anexo em HTML foi limpo...
URL: http://radio-amador.net/pipermail/cluster/attachments/20110406/0238a5d7/attachment.htm