<div dir="ltr"><br><div><img src="cid:ii_15becf6694edf337" alt="Imagem intercalada 1" width="316" height="159"><img src="cid:ii_15becf75d0e0617f" alt="Imagem intercalada 2" width="202" height="250"><br></div><div><table width="990" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:verdana,arial,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:medium"><tbody><tr><td width="610" valign="top"><table width="610" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"><tbody><tr><td colspan="2"><div id="gmail-story"><h1 style="font-size:16pt">Comparing the performance of an inverted vee dipole with a small transmitting loop on 40m</h1><p>SOTABeams have published an interesting article. It says:<br><br>Portable operators pick which antenna to use for a wide variety of reasons. Performance is often high on the list but it&#39;s by no means the only factor.</p><p>This experiment compares the performance of two popular portable antennas: an inverted vee dipole and a small transmitting loop. <br>The experiment was carried out in carefully controlled conditions</p><p>Read the full article at:<br><a href="http://www.sotabeams.co.uk/blog/comparing-the-performance-of-an-inverted-vee-dipole-with-a-small-transmitting-loop-on-40m/" target="_blank" style="color:rgb(0,51,102);text-decoration-line:none">http://www.sotabeams.co.uk/blog/comparing-the-performance-of-an-inverted-vee-dipole-with-a-small-transmitting-loop-on-40m/</a></p></div></td></tr></tbody></table></td></tr></tbody></table></div></div>