<p dir="ltr">Com os 120€ que custa um ano de indicativo ocasional diria que há tudo menos prejuízo.. Quando digo estas coisas a estrangeiros há sempre reações curiosas... Nao conheço ninguém que pague tanto pelo radio como nós... </p>
<p dir="ltr">Rui Oliveira <br>
CR7ALW </p>
<div class="gmail_quote">Em 31/07/2015 14:28, "João Costa &gt; CT1FBF" <<a href="mailto:ct1fbf@gmail.com">ct1fbf@gmail.com</a>> escreveu:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Definitivamente, vamos ter de convencer rapidamente a ANACOM<br>
portuguesa que fica mais caro processar uma cobrança do que cobrar,<br>
mesmo sendo esta computorizada como em Portugal.<br>
<br>
João Costa (CT1FBF)<br>
<br>
<br>
2015-07-31 14:14 GMT+01:00 Rui Oliveira <<a href="mailto:ruimail24@gmail.com">ruimail24@gmail.com</a>>:<br>
> Como diz na mensagem: " the FCC said it was doing so to save money<br>
> and*personnel resources. The Commission asserted that it costs more of both<br>
> to process the regulatory fees and issue refunds than the amount of the<br>
> regulatory fee payment."<br>
><br>
> Portanto dizem eles que fica mais caro processar uma cobrança do que<br>
> cobrar.... E eles como alguma consideração que tem com os amadores preferem<br>
> eliminar os custos dos 2 lados a subir os dos amadores. É menos negativo<br>
> para a fcc tratar de indicativos de chamada de graça do que perder dinheiro<br>
> a tratar deles mais perder dinheiro a cobrar... O aumento para cobrir ambos<br>
> os custos para resultar num lucro na mesma nulo não se justificam. É melhor<br>
> simplesmente não cobrar...<br>
><br>
> Em 31/07/2015 13:38, "João Costa &gt; CT1FBF" <<a href="mailto:ct1fbf@gmail.com">ct1fbf@gmail.com</a>> escreveu:<br>
>><br>
>> Rui,<br>
>><br>
>> Faz-me um pouco de confusão pois as taxas dos " vanity call sign "<br>
>> passaram de $16,10 para $21,40 por um período de 10 anos e agora vão<br>
>> acabar ??? Quando só aqui a FCC arrecadava mais $250 000 e quando o<br>
>> Congresso solicitou uma colecta de $340 milhões para o ano fiscal de<br>
>> 2015 e quando a FCC diz que ainda vai poupar dinheiro e pessoal<br>
>> acabando com esta taxa.<br>
>><br>
>> Isto até me parece típica engenharia financeira à portuguesa, hihihihi.<br>
>><br>
>> João Costa (CT1FBF)<br>
>><br>
>> 2015-07-31 13:19 GMT+01:00 Rui Oliveira <<a href="mailto:ruimail24@gmail.com">ruimail24@gmail.com</a>>:<br>
>> > Se me permite, claro colega João, o corpo da notícia indica que o que<br>
>> > desaparece é os custos de ter um indicativo ocasional e não a<br>
>> > possibilidade<br>
>> > de eles existirem.<br>
>> > Nuns países não se paga... Aqui paga-se bem...<br>
>> ><br>
>> > Rui Oliveira<br>
>> > CR7ALW<br>
>> ><br>
>> > Em 31/07/2015 13:09, "João Costa &gt; CT1FBF" <<a href="mailto:ct1fbf@gmail.com">ct1fbf@gmail.com</a>><br>
>> > escreveu:<br>
>> >><br>
>> >> Amateur Radio vanity call sign fee to disappear in September<br>
>> >><br>
>> >> The Amateur Radio vanity call sign regulatory fee is set to disappear<br>
>> >> in the next few weeks. According to the best-available information<br>
>> >> from FCC sources, the first day that applicants will be able to file a<br>
>> >> vanity application without having to pay a fee is Thursday, September<br>
>> >> 3.<br>
>> >><br>
>> >> In deciding earlier this year to drop the regulatory fee components<br>
>> >> for Amateur Radio vanity call signs and General Mobile Radio Service<br>
>> >> (GMRS) applications, the FCC said it was doing so to save money and<br>
>> >> personnel resources. The Commission asserted that it costs more of<br>
>> >> both to process the regulatory fees and issue refunds than the amount<br>
>> >> of the regulatory fee payment.<br>
>> >><br>
>> >> "Our costs have increased over time, and now that the costs exceed the<br>
>> >> amount of the regulatory fee, the increased relative administrative<br>
>> >> cost supports eliminating this regulatory fee category," the FCC said<br>
>> >> in its Report and Order, which appeared on July 21 in The Federal<br>
>> >> Register. "Once [it's] eliminated, these licensees will no longer be<br>
>> >> financially burdened with such payments, and the Commission will no<br>
>> >> longer incur these administrative costs that exceed the fee payments."<br>
>> >><br>
>> >> The FCC raised the Amateur Service vanity call sign regulatory fee<br>
>> >> from $16.10 to its current $21.40 for the 10-year license term in<br>
>> >> 2014. The $5.30 increase was the largest such fee hike in many years.<br>
>> >> In a typical fiscal year, the FCC collected on the order of $250,000<br>
>> >> in vanity call sign regulatory fees.<br>
>> >><br>
>> >> The FCC said the revenue it would otherwise collect from such<br>
>> >> regulatory fees "will be proportionally assessed on other wireless fee<br>
>> >> categories." Congress has mandated that the FCC collect nearly $340<br>
>> >> million in regulatory fees from all services in fiscal year 2015.<br>
>> >><br>
>> >> Fonte : The American Radio Relay League<br>
>> >><br>
>> >><br>
>> >> _______________________________________________<br>
>> >> CLUSTER mailing list<br>
>> >> <a href="mailto:CLUSTER@radio-amador.net">CLUSTER@radio-amador.net</a><br>
>> >> <a href="http://radio-amador.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cluster" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://radio-amador.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cluster</a><br>
>> >><br>
>> ><br>
>> > _______________________________________________<br>
>> > CLUSTER mailing list<br>
>> > <a href="mailto:CLUSTER@radio-amador.net">CLUSTER@radio-amador.net</a><br>
>> > <a href="http://radio-amador.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cluster" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://radio-amador.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cluster</a><br>
>> ><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> _______________________________________________<br>
>> CLUSTER mailing list<br>
>> <a href="mailto:CLUSTER@radio-amador.net">CLUSTER@radio-amador.net</a><br>
>> <a href="http://radio-amador.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cluster" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://radio-amador.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cluster</a><br>
>><br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> CLUSTER mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:CLUSTER@radio-amador.net">CLUSTER@radio-amador.net</a><br>
> <a href="http://radio-amador.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cluster" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://radio-amador.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cluster</a><br>
><br>
<br>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
CLUSTER mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:CLUSTER@radio-amador.net">CLUSTER@radio-amador.net</a><br>
<a href="http://radio-amador.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cluster" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://radio-amador.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cluster</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div>