<p dir="ltr">Como diz na mensagem: " the FCC said it was doing so to save money and*personnel resources. The Commission asserted that it costs more of both to process the regulatory fees and issue refunds than the amount of the regulatory fee payment." </p>
<p dir="ltr">Portanto dizem eles que fica mais caro processar uma cobrança do que cobrar.... E eles como alguma consideração que tem com os amadores preferem eliminar os custos dos 2 lados a subir os dos amadores. É menos negativo para a fcc tratar de indicativos de chamada de graça do que perder dinheiro a tratar deles mais perder dinheiro a cobrar... O aumento para cobrir ambos os custos para resultar num lucro na mesma nulo não se justificam. É melhor simplesmente não cobrar... </p>
<div class="gmail_quote">Em 31/07/2015 13:38, "João Costa &gt; CT1FBF" <<a href="mailto:ct1fbf@gmail.com">ct1fbf@gmail.com</a>> escreveu:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Rui,<br>
<br>
Faz-me um pouco de confusão pois as taxas dos " vanity call sign "<br>
passaram de $16,10 para $21,40 por um período de 10 anos e agora vão<br>
acabar ??? Quando só aqui a FCC arrecadava mais $250 000 e quando o<br>
Congresso solicitou uma colecta de $340 milhões para o ano fiscal de<br>
2015 e quando a FCC diz que ainda vai poupar dinheiro e pessoal<br>
acabando com esta taxa.<br>
<br>
Isto até me parece típica engenharia financeira à portuguesa, hihihihi.<br>
<br>
João Costa (CT1FBF)<br>
<br>
2015-07-31 13:19 GMT+01:00 Rui Oliveira <<a href="mailto:ruimail24@gmail.com">ruimail24@gmail.com</a>>:<br>
> Se me permite, claro colega João, o corpo da notícia indica que o que<br>
> desaparece é os custos de ter um indicativo ocasional e não a possibilidade<br>
> de eles existirem.<br>
> Nuns países não se paga... Aqui paga-se bem...<br>
><br>
> Rui Oliveira<br>
> CR7ALW<br>
><br>
> Em 31/07/2015 13:09, "João Costa &gt; CT1FBF" <<a href="mailto:ct1fbf@gmail.com">ct1fbf@gmail.com</a>> escreveu:<br>
>><br>
>> Amateur Radio vanity call sign fee to disappear in September<br>
>><br>
>> The Amateur Radio vanity call sign regulatory fee is set to disappear<br>
>> in the next few weeks. According to the best-available information<br>
>> from FCC sources, the first day that applicants will be able to file a<br>
>> vanity application without having to pay a fee is Thursday, September<br>
>> 3.<br>
>><br>
>> In deciding earlier this year to drop the regulatory fee components<br>
>> for Amateur Radio vanity call signs and General Mobile Radio Service<br>
>> (GMRS) applications, the FCC said it was doing so to save money and<br>
>> personnel resources. The Commission asserted that it costs more of<br>
>> both to process the regulatory fees and issue refunds than the amount<br>
>> of the regulatory fee payment.<br>
>><br>
>> "Our costs have increased over time, and now that the costs exceed the<br>
>> amount of the regulatory fee, the increased relative administrative<br>
>> cost supports eliminating this regulatory fee category," the FCC said<br>
>> in its Report and Order, which appeared on July 21 in The Federal<br>
>> Register. "Once [it's] eliminated, these licensees will no longer be<br>
>> financially burdened with such payments, and the Commission will no<br>
>> longer incur these administrative costs that exceed the fee payments."<br>
>><br>
>> The FCC raised the Amateur Service vanity call sign regulatory fee<br>
>> from $16.10 to its current $21.40 for the 10-year license term in<br>
>> 2014. The $5.30 increase was the largest such fee hike in many years.<br>
>> In a typical fiscal year, the FCC collected on the order of $250,000<br>
>> in vanity call sign regulatory fees.<br>
>><br>
>> The FCC said the revenue it would otherwise collect from such<br>
>> regulatory fees "will be proportionally assessed on other wireless fee<br>
>> categories." Congress has mandated that the FCC collect nearly $340<br>
>> million in regulatory fees from all services in fiscal year 2015.<br>
>><br>
>> Fonte : The American Radio Relay League<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> _______________________________________________<br>
>> CLUSTER mailing list<br>
>> <a href="mailto:CLUSTER@radio-amador.net">CLUSTER@radio-amador.net</a><br>
>> <a href="http://radio-amador.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cluster" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://radio-amador.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cluster</a><br>
>><br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> CLUSTER mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:CLUSTER@radio-amador.net">CLUSTER@radio-amador.net</a><br>
> <a href="http://radio-amador.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cluster" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://radio-amador.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cluster</a><br>
><br>
<br>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
CLUSTER mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:CLUSTER@radio-amador.net">CLUSTER@radio-amador.net</a><br>
<a href="http://radio-amador.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cluster" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://radio-amador.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cluster</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div>