<div dir="ltr">Caro colega João Costa.<div><br></div><div>Pois ... mas para um hobby pagarmos por um ICOA quase tanto como uma licença de UHF para uma rede privativa acho exagerado.</div><div><br></div><div>Enfim temos que viver com o que temos, e só podemos almejar que um dia o nosso país viva de forma mais coerente e ajustada à nossa realidade.</div><div><br></div><div>73</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 1:38 PM, João Costa > CT1FBF <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ct1fbf@gmail.com" target="_blank">ct1fbf@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">Boa Tarde Rui,<div><br></div><div>Sempre podes sugerir à ANACOM um ICOA a troco de 120,00 € anuais.</div><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><div><br></div><div>João Costa (CT1FBF)</div></font></span><div><div class="h5"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">2014-09-25 13:18 GMT+01:00 Rui Silva <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ruijorgesilva1@gmail.com" target="_blank">ruijorgesilva1@gmail.com</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">Acho eu, que aqui em Portugal deviam fazer o mesmo, aliás até "encaixavam" mais receita, com a personalização!<br><br>Diga-se que fui fazer o exame já com o intuito de verificar a possibilidade de ter um IC que não estava atribuido a ninguém!<br>Mas quando a menina me disse que era o sistema que criava aleatoriamente, cairam as minhas expectativas!<br>Mas pagaria para ter um IC personalizado! Os 20 Euros para mim, eram aceitáveis!</div><br><br><br><div><font color="#999999">Sent with <a href="https://mailtrack.io/install?source=signature&lang=en&referral=ruijorgesilva1@gmail.com&idSignature=22" target="_blank">MailTrack</a></font></div><img width="1" height="1" src="https://mailtrack.io/trace/mail/246d14c4ae8f5b5c36bad8537a34b8ad221714aa.png"></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br clear="all"><div><div dir="ltr">Sem outro assunto de momento<br><br>Cumprimentos<br><br>Rui Silva<br>93 634 52 33<br><div>96 501 71 57<br><br>Não é um papel que diz aquilo que somos, mas sim, o que fazemos.<br></div></div></div>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">2014-09-08 10:45 GMT+01:00 João Costa > CT1FBF <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ct1fbf@gmail.com" target="_blank">ct1fbf@gmail.com</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><h1>New Amateur Radio vanity callsign fee set at $21.40</h1><p>The FCC has adjusted very slightly downward - to $21.40 - its proposed Amateur Service vanity call sign regulatory fee for Fiscal Year 2014. </p><p>In a June Notice of Proposed Rule Making (NPRM), the Commission said it was planning to hike the current $16.10 vanity fee to $21.60 for the 10-year license term. </p><p>The FCC released a Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (R&O) in the proceeding on August 29, in which it recalculated the fee to $21.40 for the 10-year license term. The $5.30 increase still represents the largest vanity fee hike in many years.</p><p>The new $21.40 fee does not go into effect until 30 days after the R&O is published in The Federal Register.</p><p>In the R&O, the FCC said it considered eliminating the regulatory fee for Amateur Radio vanity call sign applications but decided not to do so "at this time," because it lacks "adequate support to determine whether the cost of recovery and burden on small entities outweighs the collected revenue; or whether eliminating the fee would adversely affect the licensing process." The Commission said it would reevaluate this issue in the future to determine if it should eliminate other fee categories.</p><p>The FCC's Wireless Telecommunications Bureau sets the vanity call sign regulatory fee using projections of new applications and renewals, taking into consideration existing Commission licensee databases, such as the Universal Licensing System (ULS) database.</p><p>The FCC reported there were 11,500 "payment units" in FY 2014. The Commission said the vanity program generated an estimated $230,230 in FY 2013 revenue, and it estimated that it would collect nearly $246,100 in FY 2014.</p><p>The vanity call sign regulatory fee is payable when applying for a new vanity call sign or when renewing a vanity call sign, although some older vanity call signs are not subject to the regulatory fee.</p><p><font size="1">Fonte: <a href="http://www.arrl.org/" target="_blank"><font color="#0066cc">The American Radio Relay League</font></a></font></p></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
CLUSTER mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:CLUSTER@radio-amador.net" target="_blank">CLUSTER@radio-amador.net</a><br>
<a href="http://radio-amador.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cluster" target="_blank">http://radio-amador.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cluster</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
CLUSTER mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:CLUSTER@radio-amador.net" target="_blank">CLUSTER@radio-amador.net</a><br>
<a href="http://radio-amador.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cluster" target="_blank">http://radio-amador.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cluster</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div></div></div></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
CLUSTER mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:CLUSTER@radio-amador.net">CLUSTER@radio-amador.net</a><br>
<a href="http://radio-amador.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cluster" target="_blank">http://radio-amador.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cluster</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div dir="ltr"><div>Melhores 73</div>--<div>Filipe Pereira</div><div>CS7AFP</div></div>
</div>