<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD><TITLE></TITLE>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.3676" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY><!-- Converted from text/plain format -->
<H1><IMG style="WIDTH: 336px; HEIGHT: 261px" height=552
src="http://cssti.files.wordpress.com/2009/06/bluetooth_rings_lg.jpg"
width=675><IMG style="WIDTH: 248px; HEIGHT: 146px" height=165
src="http://www.multilaser.com.br/guiainfo/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/bluetooth_large1.jpg"
width=310></H1>
<H1>60 GHz Bluetooth ?</H1>
<P><FONT face=Tahoma>A report in <EM><STRONG>EE Times</STRONG></EM> indicates
that a future gigabit version of Bluetooth may use the 60 GHz band.</FONT></P>
<P><FONT face=Tahoma>EE Times say:</FONT></P>
<P><FONT face=Tahoma>The Bluetooth Special Interest Group is expected to create
a study group to help pick a transport for a future gigabit-class version of the
short-range wireless technology. </FONT></P>
<P><FONT face=Tahoma>Among the leading candidates are the rival flavors of 60
GHz technology promoted by the WirelessHD Consortium and the Wireless Gigabit
Alliance.</FONT></P>
<P><FONT face=Tahoma>The Bluetooth SIG had hoped to make a decision about its
high-speed future at a regular meeting in Seattle this week. However, due to the
volcano in Iceland most of the group's European members were not able to make
the trip.</FONT></P>
<P><FONT face=Tahoma> </FONT></P>
<P><FONT face=Tahoma>Read the full EE Times article at<BR></FONT><A
href="http://www.eetimes.com/224400799" target=_blank><FONT
face=Tahoma>http://www.eetimes.com/224400799</FONT></A></P></BODY></HTML>