ARLA/CLUSTER: Hallo Antenna para VHF
Carlos Fonseca - CT1GFQ
ct1gfqgrupos gmail.com
Quarta-Feira, 30 de Abril de 2014 - 22:41:20 WEST
Com todos os detalhes.
Espero que seja util.
http://www.qsl.net/kp4md/144_mhz_halo.htm
144 MHz Halo Antenna
Construction and Analysis of a Low Cost Omnidirectional Horizontally Polarized Antenna for 144 MHz
by Dr. Carol F. Milazzo, KP4MD (posted 23 May 2012)
E-mail: kp4md arrl.net
a.. Construction
b.. Model Analysis and Measurements
c.. Stacking Halo Antennas
d.. Gain and Polarization Comparisons
e.. References
f.. Return to KP4MD Home Page
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Here is one of the pair of 2 meter Halo antennas I built this week. I needed a horizontally polarized antenna for a144 MHz WSPR propagation study and planned to stack these to increase omnidirectional gain. I will use it with myElecraft XV144 transverter with 20 watts peak output power and lower loss RG-8/U coaxial cable feed line. The materials for this one antenna cost about $6. Commercial versions cost about $50 or more.
2. The boom is an 18 inch piece of the 1/2" Carlon "Plus 40" Rigid PVC Conduit that my husband had in the garden shed. I bought the 10 foot roll of 1/4 inch copper tubing for $9 at Home Depot. It comes coiled in nearly the required diameter. I cut a 41 inch length of it and easily formed it into the 13-1/8 inch diameter shape. The loop is continuous except for a gap between the open ends at the right end of the boom.
3. The open ends of the loop here are separated by 1.5 inches. The resonant frequency of the antenna will vary with the distance between these open ends. The open ends of the boom will later be sealed for weatherproofing.
4. Detail of the 6-32 x 1" screw ready to be soldered to the center pin of the SO-239 connector.
5. The 6-32 x 1" screw is soldered to the center pin of the SO-239 connector.
6. The PVC Boom is drilled for the SO-239 antenna connector. The center pin is 1-7/8" away from the center point of the copper tubing.
7. Several #6 washers were placed under a #6 nut to securely maintain its position and to prevent traction on the solder joint when the mica trimmer capacitor is secured onto the screw.
8. The SO-239 antenna connector is secured to the PVC boom with two 6-32 x 1½" screws.
9. The shell of the SO-239 connector is connected to the copper tubing with 12 AWG bare copper wire which is soldered to the tubing.
10. The side of the boom behind the SO-239 antenna connector with the mica compression trimmer capacitor secured with a 6-32 nut onto the 6-32 screw that is soldered to the center pin of the SO-239 connector.
11. Close-up view of the mica compression trimmer capacitor connected between the gamma match rod and the screw on the center pin of the SO-239 antenna connector.
12. I investigated several feed methods and selected a gamma match with a 30-180 pF mica compression trimmer capacitor (Arco 463 type) soldered to a 6 inch length of the ¼" tubing. At maximum capacitance, it barely brought the impedance 50 ohms and zero reactance. The back-to-back alligator clips are a temporary shorting bar.
13. The original ¼" tubing gamma match arm was replaced with a 7" length of 10 AWG bare copper wire spaced 1-7/8" from the radiator element. This decreased the capacitance required to 80 pF to achieve the non-reactive 50 ohms impedance match. Tuning the antenna requires three adjustments: the gap space, the shorting bar location and the capacitor, and these all interact. With the capacitor at mid range, I first adjusted the gap for lowest SWR at 145 MHz, then adjusted the capacitor and moved the shorting bar position for lowest SWR. I repeated this procedure until finding the "sweet spot" where 1:1 SWR was achieved at 145 MHz and then soldered the shorting bar in place.
14. 20 May 2012 - The 144 MHz halo antenna was mounted at 80 inches (1 λ) above the metal roof and fed with Belden 8214 foam type RG-8/U coaxial cable. At first, the antenna resonance was unstable and sensitive to the routing of the feed line until 5 turns of it were wound to form a 8 inch diameter choke balun. The standing wave ratio was then measured as 1:1 at 145.0 MHz.
15. A closer view of the 144 MHz halo antenna. The entire antenna was weatherproofed with clear acrylic spray paint. The open ends of the boom and the PL-259 connector were sealed with a self sealing silicone tape called Rescue Tape. Both open ends of the copper loop were outside the boom with approximately 1.5" gap distance for resonance at 145 MHz.
16. Close up view of the PL-259 antenna connector sealed with Rescue Tape. The open spaces between the boom and the SO-239 connector were sealed with GOOP Plumbing contact adhesive and sealant, selected as it does not release corrosive acetic acid during curing.
17. 144 MHz Halo antenna NEC model calculated SWR vs. Frequency.
18. 144 MHz Halo antenna measured SWR vs. Frequency. The SWR measured at the feed point was 1.3:1 or less over the 144.0 to 146.4 MHz range.
19. 144 MHz Single Halo Antenna 4nec2 Calculations. As the gamma match is not amenable to accurate NEC modeling1, I used the high-pass L-network under the RLC matching function (F10) of 4nec2 when generating the frequency sweep curves in Figures 17 and 20.
20. 144 MHz Halo antenna NEC Model calculated Resistance and Reactance vs. Frequency.
21. 144 MHz Stacked Halo antennas Resistance and Reactance vs. Frequency measured with a miniVNA Pro vector network analyzer.
22. 144 MHz single Halo Antenna azimuth pattern calculated by NEC Model.
23. 144 MHz single Halo Antenna elevation pattern calculated by NEC Model.
24. 144 MHz single Halo antenna 3 dimensional radiation pattern calculated by NEC Model.
25. 144 MHz 2 stacked Halo Antennas azimuth pattern calculated by NEC Model.
26. 144 MHz 2 stacked Halo Antennas elevation pattern calculated by NEC Model.
27. 144 MHz 2 stacked Halo Antennas 3 dimensional radiation pattern calculated by NEC Model.
28. 144 MHz 2 stacked Halo Antennas 4nec2 Calculations.
CM 144 MHz Halo Antenna NEC model by Carol F. Milazzo, KP4MD
CM Horizontal orientation (using GH command)
CM Frequency = 145.000 MHz
CM Impedance 50 ohms
CM 26-side polygon (40 inch loop with 1.5 inch gap)
CM Simulated good ground
CM Use the high-pass L-network to simulate the gamma match
CE
SY frq=145 'frequency MHz
SY cir=40.00758 'Input loop circumference inches (loop + gap)
SY r=0.5*cir/3.1415926 'Calculate loop radius
SY dia=0.25 'Input loop wire dia. inches
SY rad=0.5*dia 'Calculate loop wire radius
SY n=26 'Input n-side polygon of loop + gap
SY h=81.74 'Input height to loop inches
SY g=1.5 'Input gap size in inches
SY gseg=int(n*g/cir+0.5) 'Calculate gap length in segments
GH 1 n-gseg 1e-300 1e-300*(n-gseg)/n r r r r rad
GM 0 0 0 0 gseg*180/n 0 0 h 0
GS 0 0 0.0254
GE 1
LD 5 0 0 0 58000000 '1/4 inch copper tubing
GN 2 0 0 0 4 0.01
EK
EX 0 1 (n-gseg)/2 0 1. 0 0 'Feed point
FR 0 0 0 0 frq 0
EN
29. 144 MHz Single Halo Antenna NEC model.
CM 144 MHz 2 Stacked Halo Antennas at 40 and 80 inches NEC model by Carol F. Milazzo, KP4MD
CM Horizontal orientation (using GH command)
CM Frequency = 145.000 MHz
CM Impedance 50 ohms
CM 26-side polygon (40 inch loop with 1.5 inch gap)
CM Simulated good ground
CE
SY frq=145 'frequency MHz
SY cir=40.21493 'Input loop circumference inches (loop + gap)
SY r=0.5*cir/3.1415926 'Calculate loop radius
SY dia=0.25 'Input loop wire dia. inches
SY rad=0.5*dia 'Calculate loop wire radius
SY n=26 'Input n-side polygon of loop + gap
SY h=81.74 'Input height to loop inches
SY g=1.5 'Input gap size in inches
SY gseg=int(n*g/cir+0.5) 'Calculate gap length in segments
GH 1 n-gseg 1e-300 1e-300*(n-gseg)/n r r r r rad
GM 0 0 0 0 gseg*180/n 0 0 h/2 1
GM 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 h/2 1
GS 0 0 0.0254
GE 1
LD 5 0 0 0 58000000 '1/4 inch copper tubing
GN 2 0 0 0 4 0.01
EK
EX 0 1 (n-gseg)/2 0 0.5 0 0 'Feed point
EX 0 2 (n-gseg)/2 0 0.5 0 0 'Feed point
FR 0 0 0 0 frq 0
EN
30. 144 MHz 2 stacked Halo Antennas NEC model.
31. Two identical 0.75 λ lengths of RG-11/U 75 ohm coaxial cable were prepared for the stacking harness. After trimming to achieve zero ohms reactance at 145 MHz, each of my cables measured exactly 40.25 inches from tip to tip. This measurement may vary slightly due to variations in the velocity factors among different batches and manufacturers of cable.
32. The two lengths of RG-11/U cable are joined with a UHF Tee connector to form the stacking harness. When measured from either end of the assembled stacking harness, the SWR analyzer should indicate zero ohms reactance and over 300 ohms resistance at 145 MHz. When erected, the free end of each RG-11/U cable will be connected to a halo antenna and the 50 ohm feed line connected to the center of the Tee connector.
33. The lower halo is mounted at 40 inches height (0.5 λ) above the roof and the upper halo is mounted 40 inches above it (1 λ). The gamma match sections should be oriented on the same side of both halo antennas.
34. A weather shield was fashioned from a recyclable plastic container and glued to the PVC boom of the upper halo antenna. Its purpose is to protect the feed point and the gamma match capacitor from rain.
35. A similar weather shield was placed on the lower halo antenna. The spaces in and around the mating surfaces of all the connectors were filled with petroleum jelly and the connectors wrapped with self-sealing silicone tape.
36. The blue line indicates the standing wave ratio for the stacked 2 meter halo antennas is less than 1.3:1 over the 144 through 146 MHz frequency range, measured with a miniVNA Pro vector network analyzer.
NOTES ON HALO ANTENNA STACKING
a.. Figure 30. The separation distance of stacked halo antennas can be optimized for either gain or radiation pattern. Using my NEC model analysis, a 48 inch separation yielded 8.7 dBi gain at 15° elevation angle and a -8 dBi minor lobe at 90° elevation. The 40.5 inch separation yielded 7.9 dBi gain at 15° elevation and a -40 dBi sharp null at 90° elevation. I selected the latter model to optimize the signal to noise ratio through both maximizing the gain toward the horizon while minimizing the gain toward noise sources from the undesired higher elevation angles.
b.. Figure 31. One method to determine the velocity factor of a coaxial cable is to attach one end of the cable to an antenna analyzer with the far end open, and to find the lowest frequency at which the measured impedance is zero. Then divide the cable length by the free space length of a quarter wave. My RG-11/U coaxial cable's measured velocity factor was 0.66. I used this calculated velocity factor to cut each of my 75 ohm stacking harness sections to slightly longer than 3/4 wavelength at 145 MHz. With one end of each section attached to the antenna analyzer, I trimmed the far end until the analyzer read zero ohms reactance at the 145 MHz frequency with the PL-259 attached on both ends. To account for the additional conductor length inside the Tee connector, the analyzer should read zero ohms reactance and over 300 ohms resistance when measuring from either end of the assembled stacking harness. Fedler demonstrated an alternative method using an oscilloscope and function generator.8
c.. Figure 33. The proximity of each halo antenna to the other affects the tuning of both. With each of my halos mounted in its final location on the mast on the roof, I tuned each individually for minimal SWR at 145 MHz. When I then connected both of the antennas to the stacking harness, the SWR was 1.3:1 or lower from 144 MHz through 146 MHz (Figure 36) and no further adjustment was necessary.
d.. Figure 33. My RG-11/U stacking harness only allowed a single turn loop at the feed point of each halo, so my choke balun consisted of several turns of the 50 ohm coaxial cable at the Tee connector. The choke balun decouples the antenna from the feed line and stabilizes the tuning of the antenna that otherwise would be affected by any movement and the proximity of the feed line to other structures.
37. Radio Mobile Online predicted line of sight signal strength for stacked halo antennas at KP4MD station in Citrus Heights, CA. Limit of WSPR reception at signal strength (0.004 µV) -30 dB to -20 dB SNR in orange area, greater than -20 dB SNR in yellow area. Transmitter power 50 watts, antenna height 6 meters.
COMPARISON OF J-POLE VS. SINGLE AND STACKED HALO ANTENNAS
a.. Figures 19 and 22 through 24 show the expected performance with a single halo antenna at 80 inches (1 λ) above the metal roof (effective ground).
b.. Figures 25 through 28 and 39 through 41 show the expected performance with two stacked identical halo antennas, one at 40 inches (½ λ) and the other at 80 inches (1 λ) above the metal roof (effective ground).
c.. Figures 42 through 44 show the predicted radiation patterns of the J-pole antenna.
d.. The video clips at Figure 38 demonstrate the effect on received signal strength when antenna polarization is matched or mismatched.
e.. The predicted increase in RDF (receiving directivity factor), the increased gain at 15º elevation and the suppression of the radiation lobes at 45º with the stacked halo antennas did improve the overall performance over the single halo antenna.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------- próxima parte ----------
Um anexo em HTML foi limpo...
URL: http://radio-amador.net/pipermail/cluster/attachments/20140430/b7e52313/attachment.htm
Mais informações acerca da lista CLUSTER